البنى الفنية و الاسلوبية في شعر الشعوبية

Abstract

The research focused on the subject of populism and killing the research from various political, social, religious, ideological, psychological, and philosophical angles. It wasn't a work of authorship, but rather a new research approach, not about the idea of populism itself, but about how the literature of populism was written. It delved into its stylistic elements, structural unity, semantic fields, linguistic structures, its metaphors, and its reality. I cancelled the idea that I understand its meaning as a belief and literature among the poets. Instead, I pursued those premises, attempting to grasp the linguistic and artistic dominances, which yielded research results. I discovered that the starting point wasn't the traditional concept of populism as the oppressed Persians in the Umayyad era but rather people of every ethnicity, homeland, and country experiencing inequality in human dignity. The poets, the research sample, agreed in their poems on a set of dominances and stylistic standards that drew the final picture of the populist thought based on belittling the gender of the other and the latter's attempt to reclaim the human right deprived of respect and equality. Among those stylistic features is the dominance of the singular and predominantly plural pronouns, standing in opposition to the element diminishing their humanity and to restore the lost dignity, to regain balance for themselves and their people, recalling their illustrious past and promising present, envisioning a future by physically manifesting their historical symbols and prominent figures who shaped history. Then, resorting to dialogue in a give-and-take manner, the artistic element and stylistic criterion excelled in intricately portraying the features of populist poetry both in terms of thought and content. The semantic field played a role in comparing the characteristics of the two groups, the oppressed and the oppressor, leading to a conclusion suggesting that there is no stronger or weaker element, each with its own merits, depending on the angle of view.